Apolitìa and Tradition in Julius Evola as Reaction to Nihilism

Marine Biodiversity Records, page 1 of 4. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2011
doi:10.1017/S1755267211000558; Vol. 4; e57; 2011 Published online
Notes on the occurrence of Syngnathus
rostellatus (Teleostei: Syngnathidae)
in the Mediterranean
pascal i. hablu¤tzel1,2 and anthony b. wilson1
1
Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich,
Switzerland, 2Laboratory of Animal Diversity and Systematics, K.U. Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Syngnathus rostellatus is a nearshore pipefish species whose distributional range extends along the European Atlantic coast
between Bergen (NO) and the Bay of Biscay (ES). Several recent articles suggest that this species has experienced a major range
expansion of more than 4000 km into the eastern Mediterranean, but a critical review of these studies indicates that the
majority of these reports are based on specimen misidentifications. Considering a reliable report of S. rostellatus from the
Mediterranean coast near Gibraltar, it appears that the current distribution of this species is restricted to the north-eastern
Atlantic Ocean and the southern Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula.
Keywords: range expansion, species identification, Syngnathus rostellatus, pipefish
Submitted 17 November 2010; accepted 8 April 2011
INTRODUCTION
There is increasing evidence that human-mediated environmental changes, including the erosion of geographical
barriers, the introduction of exotic species, and habitat degradation, are influencing the distribution of species (e.g. Rahel,
2007; Hiddink & ter Hofstede, 2008). The accelerated rate of
human modifications of the natural environment is paralleled
by an increasing number of reports documenting extensions
and contractions of the historical ranges of many species
(e.g. Sax & Gaines, 2003; Azzurro, 2008; Thomas, 2010).
The value of these studies is entirely dependent on the accurate identification of specimens, and the misidentification of
material can lead to erroneous conclusions of major shifts in
species’ ranges.
Close to 40 nominal species of the globally-distributed
genus Syngnathus are currently recognized in the
Eschmeyer’s Catalogue of Fishes (2010). Of these, eleven are
known to occur in Europe, making this the most species-rich
group of syngnathid fish in the region (Dawson, 1986). While
nine of these species names are in common use (e.g. Dawson,
1986), two species from the Black Sea (S. affinis, Eichwald,
1831 and S. argentatus, Pallas, 1814) were only recently
reinstated by Kuiter (2009). Kuiter (2009), however, provides
no justification for the reinstatement of these species names,
and a more systematic analysis of Black Sea pipefish will be
necessary in order to clarify their species status. The taxonomic status of at least two additional species is also
unclear. The nearshore S. agassiz Michahelles, 1829 sensu
Canestrini (1872) was synonymized with S. abaster by
Corresponding author:
P.I. Hablu¨tzel
Email: pascal.habluetzel@bio.kuleuven.be
Lueken (1967), but this species was reinstated by Roig
(1979) on the basis of an exhaustive analysis of historical
and contemporary collections from the Balearic Islands and
Spanish coast, a Spanish-language report that appears to
have been overlooked by subsequent researchers. Genetic
and morphometric analyses of pipefish material from the
Mediterranean and Black Seas suggest that S. nigrolineatus
Eichwald, 1831 may also represent a distinct species
(Hablu¨tzel & Wilson, unpublished data). Clearly, the taxonomy of Syngnathus pipefish is in a state of flux, and the
genus is in need of a full systematic revision.
Of the nine commonly-recognized species, two (S. phlegon
Risso, 1827 and S. schmidti Popov, 1928) are pelagic, while the
others (S. abaster Risso, 1827 sensu Canestrini (1872), S. acus
Linnaeus, 1758, S. rostellatus Nilsson, 1855, S. taenionotus
Canestrini, 1871, S. tenuirostris Rathke, 1837, S. typhle
Linnaeus, 1758 and S. variegatus Pallas, 1811) are all nearshore inhabitants (Dawson, 1986), and are dominant
members of nearshore eelgrass habitats along the European
coastline.
Syngnathus rostellatus (Nilsson’s pipefish) was originally
described from western Sweden (Nilsson, 1855), and the
northern French S. dumerilii Moreau, 1870 in Dume´ril
(1870) is now considered a junior synonym of this species
(Fries et al., 1895; Wheeler, 1973). Ehrenbaum (1905 –1909)
described the distribution range of S. rostellatus as the
Atlantic coast between Bergen and the Sea of Biscay
(Figure 1). Syngnathus rostellatus is found at moderate densities
in the Kattegat of western Sweden, and while there are scattered
reports of individual specimens in the southern Baltic (e.g.
Ehrenbaum, 1905–1909; Otterstøm, 1917), a recent exhaustive
survey of this region failed to detect this species (HELCOM,
2007). These earlier descriptions have been complemented by
subsequent reports of S. rostellatus from the northern Irish
coast (Douglas & Egan, 1983) and sites as far south as Ma´laga,
1
2
pascal i. hablu¤ tzel and anthony b. wilson
Spain (Helling (1943); Reina-Herva´s et al. (1981–1982))
(Figure 1). Syngnathus rostellatus has recently been reported
from sites within the Mediterranean as far east as southern
Turkey (Louisy, 2002; Go¨koglu et al., 2004; Ben Amor et al.,
2008) (Figure 1), suggesting that this species may be experiencing a major range extension.
Here, we provide a morphological diagnosis of S. rostellatus, and use this tool to evaluate recent reports of S. rostellatus
outside its historical distributional range (Dawson, 1986). Our
analyses indicate that the majority of these recent reports stem
from the misidentification of specimens and that the distribution of this species remains restricted to the north-eastern
Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian
Peninsula.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pipefish individuals were identified on the basis of the meristic
and morphometric data provided in the original articles and,
if available, from pictures. The original description of
Syngnathus rostellatus by Nilsson (1855), together with subsequent descriptions by Moreau in Dume´ril (1870) and
Dawson (1986) were used as references, and these descriptions
were supplemented with the analysis of ethanol-preserved
specimens from northern Spain (Sada) and western Sweden
(Fiskeba¨ckskil) (Table 1). Methods for the measurements
and meristic counts used in this article follow Dawson (1986).
RESULTS
Identification
Syngnathus rostellatus differs from all other European species
of the genus by the following combination of characters: distal
Fig. 1. The traditional distribution of Syngnathus rostellatus according to
Dawson (1986) (black), extended by reports from the Irish (Douglas & Egan,
1983), Portuguese (Almeida, 1986) and Spanish (Reina-Herva´s et al.,
1981 – 1982) coasts and the southern Baltic Sea (Ehrenbaum, 1905 – 1909;
Otterstøm, 1917) (grey); collection localities of S. rostellatus discussed in the
text are indicated (circles), as are reports of S. rostellatus based on apparent
misidentifications of specimens (stars).
margins of body rings without spine-like points; 13– 17 trunk
rings; 35– 42 tail rings; 32 –45 dorsal fin rays; 10– 13 pectoral
fin rays; lack of brown dots in the dorsal fin; and small size
(,17 cm total length (TL)) (Table 1). While the meristic
counts of the Black Sea population of S. abaster (S. abaster
nigrolineatus sensu Berg (1949)) overlap with those of S. rostellatus, this species can be clearly distinguished from S. rostellatus both morphologically and genetically (Hablu¨tzel &
Wilson, unpublished data)).
Distribution
Almeida (1986) reported 12 S. rostellatus specimens (including 8 pregnant males) from Vila Nova de Milfontes (PT)
(Figure 1). The reproductive status of the individual specimens was not indicated in the original paper, but the data provided indicate that the smallest pregnant male in this
collection had a TL of ≤ 12.1 cm. Syngnathus rostellatus,
S. abaster, S. agassiz and S. typhle are the only four coastassociated species of Syngnathus in western Europe which
are reported to reach sexual maturity at this size.
Syngnathus abaster has fewer dorsal fin rays ( ≤ 31), S.
agassiz has less tail rings ( ≤ 35) and S. typhle has more pectoral fin rays ( ≥ 14) than does S. rostellatus (Table 1). The
meristic counts of the specimens collected by Almeida
(1986) are thus consistent with the identification of these
specimens as S. rostellatus (Table 1). Almeida (1986) also
re-examined specimens from Praia de Mira (PT) (Figure 1)
collected by Helling (1943) and identified these individuals
as S. rostellatus. On the basis of the details provided in
Almeida (1986), we conclude that all of these individuals are
indeed S. rostellatus.
Reports of S. rostellatus from Ma´laga (Figure 1) by Lozano
& Rey (1919) and Reina-Herva´s et al. (1981 –1982) also
appear to be reliable. While details on the specimens analysed
by Lozano & Rey (1919) were not provided in the original
publication, Reina-Herva´s et al. (1981 –1982) provided
detailed information on five specimens collected from the
same region. The low number of trunk rings detected in
these specimens (16 –17; Table 1) clearly separates them
from juvenile S. acus (trunk rings: 18 –19) which are otherwise
similar in their general appearance. The S. rostellatus from
Ma´laga also differ from S. abaster, S. agassiz and S. typhle in
meristic counts (see above).
In contrast to these reliable reports of S. rostellatus from
outside its historical range, several recent descriptions of S.
rostellatus from sites in Tunisia and Turkey (Figure 1)
appear to be in error. Photographs of the individuals included
in both of these studies are provided in the original articles
(Go¨koglu et al., 2004; Ben Amor et al., 2008). Both pictures
show large (18.7 cm and 21.1 cm TL), long-snouted species
with high numbers of trunk rings (18 for the Tunisian and
. 17 for the Anatolian individual (note that Go¨koglu et al.
used a non-standard trunk counting method which differs
from other publications of syngnathid pipefish (e.g. Dawson,
1986))), indicating that neither of these specimens are S. rostellatus (Table 1; Figure 2). The specimens illustrated by
Go¨koglu et al. (2004) and Ben Amor et al. (2008) most
closely resemble either S. tenuirostris or S. acus (Figure 2),
species which are known to occur in the Mediterranean
region (Kaup, 1856; Dawson, 1986).
Louisy (2002) reported a single S. rostellatus female from
Banyuls-sur-Mer, France (Figure 1). The author did not
occurrence of syngnathus rostellatus in mediterranean
Table 1. Meristic characters of Syngnathus rostellatus from the original species description (Nilsson, 1855) and from more recent studies of the species.
Morphological data for specimens outside the expected range for S. rostellatus are indicated in bold.
Location
N
Trunk
rings
Tail
rings
Dorsal fin
rays
Pectoral fin
rays
Length of largest
specimen (cm TL)
Conclusion
Reference
Sweden
n.a.
16
40
32–34
10
S. rostellatus
Nilsson, 1855
Coˆte du Haˆvre (FR)
Europe
Sada (ES)
Fiskeba¨ckskil (SE)
Vila Nova de Milfontes (PT)
Praia de Mira (PT)
Ma´laga (ES)
n.a.
n.a.
30
9
12
6
5
14
13–17
14–16
14–15
14–16
15
16–17
36–39
37–42
39–42
39–41
35–42
39–42
34–41
34–36
33–45
37–42
38–43
34–40
37–42
36–38
11–12
10–13
10–12
11–12
10–11
11
11–12
12.4–14.8
(5–6 tum)
10.3
17.0
13.0
13.7
14.0
16.9
n.a.
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
S. rostellatus
Gulf of Tunis (TN)
Anatolian coast (TR)
Banyuls-sur-Mer (FR)
Wismar (DE)
1
1
1
2
18
> 17
n.a.
n.a.
39
41
n.a.
n.a.
35
33
29 or 30
n.a.
12
13
n.a.
n.a.
21.1
18.7
n.a.
n.a.
Syngnathus sp.
Syngnathus sp.
S. abaster
S. typhle
Moreau in Dume´ril, 1870
Dawson, 1986
This study
This study
Almeida, 1986
Almeida, 1986
Reina-Herva´s et al.,
1981–1982
Ben Amor et al., 2008
Go¨koglu et al., 2004
Louisy, 2002
Kuiter, 2009
N, number; 1 tum ¼ 2.47 cm.
provide meristic data, but included two colour pictures of the
living specimen. The low number of dorsal fin rays (29 or 30;
Table 1) and the flattened form of the snout (versus the
slightly convex snout of S. rostellatus (Figure 2)) suggest
that the specimen is actually S. abaster. The report of S. taenionotus from southern France in Louisy (2002) also appears to
be in error, and is based on an apparent misidentification of
a S. typhle individual (data not shown). Unfortunately, the
photographs and identifications used by Louisy (2002) have
been incorporated into a recent global survey of syngnathid
species (Kuiter, 2009), further propagating these errors.
Confusion about the distributional range of S. rostellatus
also exists at its north-eastern periphery in the southern
Baltic Sea. Kuiter (2009) recently reported two specimens
from Wismar, Germany. We argue that both pictured specimens are misidentified and in fact are S. typhle, recognizable
by the elevation of the snout evident in these individuals,
Fig. 2. Photographs of the head morphology of the nearshore Syngnathus
species discussed in this article, along with an indication of the collection
locality of the individual specimens. (A) Syngnathus abaster, Scardovari (IT);
(B) S. acus, Tasende (ES); (C) S. agassiz, Naples (IT); (D) S. rostellatus, Sada
(ES); (E) S. taenionotus, Scardovari (IT); (F) S. tenuirostris, Bosphorus (TR);
(G) S. typhle, Venice (IT); (H) S. variegatus, Crimea (UA). Scale bar: 1 cm.
Pictures (A– E, G) taken from specimens collected by the authors and
collaborators (A, B, D, E, G) or from the collections of the Senckenberg
Museum in Frankfurt (C, SMF 8334 and the Muse´um National d’Histoire
Naturelle in Paris (F, MNHN 0000-6132; H, MNHN 0000-6134). Drawings
(F, H) after Rathke (1837), see Kuiter (2009) for photographs of these species.
diagnostic for this species (see Figure 2). One of the two specimens also shows a colour pattern of white spots which is
known only from juvenile S. typhle and is not found in
S. rostellatus.
The lasting impact of historical errors on the
European biogeography of Syngnathus
Dawson’s (1986) key to European syngnathid species has been
an important reference for researchers working on European
Syngnathus species. Unfortunately, an error in the illustration
included in this text has perpetuated confusion relating to
species-level identification. While the meristic counts provided in Dawson (1986) are accurate, the illustration of S. rostellatus included in this report was derived from a sketch
originally published in Fries et al. (1895) and subsequently
reprinted by Poll (1947) in his review of Belgian marine
fish. Unfortunately, while the original illustration (Fries
et al., 1895) referred to S. typhle (plate XXIX, figure 1), Poll
(1947) mislabelled this specimen as S. rostellatus in both the
text and the figure legend of his book (p. 186, figure 126),
and Dawson kept this description in his text.
Poll (1947) made a second labelling error in his Fauna de
Belgique, including an illustration of S. rostellatus originally
published in Fries et al. (1895) in his description of S. typhle
(plate XXVIII, figure 8b; note that this specimen is also inconsistently labelled as both S. rostellatus and S. acus in the original publication). Such labelling errors have undoubtedly
contributed to the confusion surrounding the identification
of European Syngnathus species, and we have attempted to
remedy this situation here, including photographs of all of
commonly recognized nearshore Syngnathus species known
to occur in this region (Figure 2).
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the reliable reports of S. rostellatus from the
Portuguese and the Spanish Mediterranean coasts, we
suggest that the current range of S. rostellatus is broader
than that indicated by Dawson (1986). The contemporary
3
4
pascal i. hablu¤ tzel and anthony b. wilson
range of this species extends from the Norwegian coast as far
south as the western Mediterranean at Ma´laga, Spain
(Figure 1). This distributional pattern coincides with the
present frontal system between Almeria and Oran, which
separates Atlantic waters to the west from Mediterranean
waters to the east (Tintore et al., 1988). Reports of S. rostellatus from Mediterranean sites east of Ma´laga appear to be
erroneous, and stem from specimen misidentifications.
HELCOM (2007) HELCOM Red list of threatened and declining species
of lampreys and fish of the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environmental
Proceedings 109, 1 –40.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Hiddink J.G. and ter Hofstede R. (2008) Climate induced increases in
species richness of marine fishes. Global Change Biology 14, 453–460.
We thank Alexandra Wegmann and Jasmin Winkler for their
assistance in species identification. Filip Volckaert and two
anonymous referees provided helpful comments on an
earlier draft of this article. We further thank the SMF and
MNHN for access to their pipefish collections. The study
was supported by the University of Zurich, Switzerland.
the Anatolian coast (Mediterranean Sea). Journal of the Marine
Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 1093–1094.
Helling H. (1943) Novo cata´logo de peixes de Portugal em colecc¸a˜o no
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Coimbra. Memo´rias e Estudos
do Museu Zoolo´gico da Universidade de Coimbra s. 1(149), 1 –110.
Kaup J.J. (1856) Catalogue of lophobranchiate fish in the collection of the
British Museum. London: British Museum.
Kuiter R.H. (2009) Seahorses and their relatives. Seaford: Aquatic
Photographics.
Louisy P. (2002) Meeresfische: Westeuropa, Mittelmeer. Stuttgart: Verlag
Eugen Ulmer.
REFERENCES
Lozano y Rey L. (1919) Los Peces de la Fauna Ibe´rica en la Colleccio´n del
Museo en 1 de enero de 1919. Trabajos del Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales Seria Zoolo´gica 39, 1–112.
Almeida A.J. (1986) Presence des poissons Syngnathus rostellatus
(Syngnathidae), Clinitrachus argentatus (Clinidae) et Sphoeroides
spencleri (Tetraodontidae) sur la coˆte du Portugal. Cie¨ncia Biolo´gica:
Ecology and Systematics (Portugal) 6, 1 –7.
Lueken W. (1967) Su¨sswasserfische der Tu¨rkei—5. Teil Syngnathidae.
Mitteilungen Hamburgisches Zoologisches Museum und Institut 64,
127–146.
fishes in the
questions. In
Mediterranean
35 in CIESM
Nilsson S. (1855) Skandinavisk fauna. Fjerde Delen: Fiskarna. Lund:
Berlingska Boktryckeriet.
Ben Amor M.M., Ben Salem M., Ben Soussi J. and Capape´ C.
(2008) Occurrence of Nilsson’s Pipefish Syngnathus rostellatus
(Osteichthyes: Syngnathidae) in the Gulf of Tunis (Central
Mediterranean). Vie et Milieu—Life and Environment 58, 189–192.
Poll M. (1947) Faune de Belgique: poissons marins. Brussels: Musee´ Royal
d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique.
Azzurro E. (2008) The advance of thermophilic
Mediterranean Sea: overview and methodological
CIESM Climate warming and related changes in
marine biota. Monaco: CIESM, pp. 39–45. [No.
Workshop Monographs, F. Briand (ed.).]
Berg L.S. (1949) Fresh-water fishes of Soviet Union and adjacent countries.
III. Fresh-water Fish. USSR Guide Fauna No. 30. Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution, by Israel Program of Scientific Translation,
pp. 927–1382. [In Russian, English translation available, 1965.]
Canestrini G. (1872) Fauna d’Italia—Parte terza—Pesci. Milano: Dottor
Francesco Vallardi.
Dawson C.E. (1986) Syngnathidae. In Whitehead P.J.P., Bauchot M.-L.,
Hureau J.-C., Nielson J. and Tortonese E. (eds) Fishes of the
Northeastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, volume II. Paris:
UNESCO, pp. 628–639.
Douglas D.J. and Egan D. (1983) The distribution of Syngnathus rostellatus Nilsson (Pisces: Syngnathidae) in Irish coastal waters. Irish
Naturalists’ Journal 21, 173–175.
Dume´ril A.H.A. (1870) Histoire Naturelle des Poissons ou Ichthyologie
Ge´ne´rale. Tome Second. Ganoı¨des, Dipne´s, Lophobranches. Paris:
Librairie Encyclope´dique de Roret.
Ehrenbaum E. (1905–1909) I. Eier und Larven von Fischen. In
Ehrenbaum E. (ed.) Nordisches Plankton—Zoologischer Teil—Erster
Band—Eier und Larven von Fischen, andere Eier und Cystem. Kiel
und Leipzig: Verlag von Lipsius & Tischer, pp. 1–414.
Eschmeyer W.N. (ed.) (2010) Catalogue of fishes. Electronic version (25
October 2010). http://research.calacademy.org/ichthyology/catalog/
fishcatmain.asp
Fries B., Ekstro¨m C.U. and Sundevall C.J. (1895) A history of
Scandinavian fishes. Part II. 2nd edition, revised and completed by
Professor F.A. Smitt. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & So¨ner.
Go¨koglu M., Bodur T. and Kaya Y. (2004) First records of Hippocampus
fuscus and Syngnathus rostellatus (Osteichthyes: Syngnathidae) from
Otterstøm C.V. (1917) Danmarks Fauna—Fisk III. Fastkæbede,
Buskgællede, Ganoider, Tværmunde og Rundmunde. Copenhagen:
G.E.C. Gads Forlag.
Rahel F.J. (2007) Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it’s a small world after all. Freshwater
Biology 52, 696–710.
Reina-Herva´s J.A., Mun˜oz R. and Blasco M. (1981–1982) Presencia de
teleosteos atla´nticos en el Mediterra´neo occidental. Monografı´as y
Trabajos de Zoologı´a (Universidad de Ma´laga) 3–4, 49–56.
Roig A. (1979) Singnathus agassizi Kaup, Canestrini: nombre va´lido para
unos singna´tidos capturados en Sa Ra´pita (Mallorca-Islas Baleares)
(Pisces, Syngnathidae). Miscela´nea Zoolo´gica (Barcelona) 5, 83–92.
Sax D.F. and Gaines S.D. (2003) Species diversity: from global decreases
to local increases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 561–566.
Thomas C.D. (2010) Climate, climate change and range boundaries.
Diversity and Distribution 16, 488–495.
Tintore J., Violette P.E., Blade I. and Cruzado A. (1988) A study of an
intense density front in the eastern Alboran Sea: the Almeria–Oran
front. Journal of Physical Oceanography 18, 1384–1397.
and
Wheeler A. (1973) Syngnathidae. In Hureau J.C. and Monod T. (eds)
Check-list of the fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and of the
Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 274–279.
Correspondence should be addressed to:
P.I. Hablu¨tzel
Laboratory of Animal Diversity and Systematics
K.U. Leuven,
Charles Deberiotstraat 32
B-3000 Leuven,
Belgium
email: pascal.habluetzel@bio.kuleuven.be